Originally published on this site in 2017, and well due an airing.
Resilient Child as Fictional Character takes Embarrassing Ketchup Sandwich to park where it can be eaten away from bullying classmates but Editor gets involved and screws up the Story so that only Litter remains.
Bon appetit!
So. The very best thing about being a fictional character is that everything you do has significance. I see all of you non-fictional beings, busying yourselves with walking here and there and nursing your ailments and swiping your screens but none of it means anything. It doesn’t further the plot, it doesn’t make the setting crisper, it doesn’t add to the tension, it doesn’t help to build a metaphor cluster. It’s just . . . making a random sandwich.
For us, by contrast, all actions, all details, are intentional and important.
Let me give you an example. See that sandwich on the bench? It’s a ketchup sandwich. And that ketchup sandwich is more than pulling its weight.
Let me introduce myself. I’m the Neglected But Resilient Child. You’ve met me before, in many guises. I may have brought you to tears. In this particular story my hapless, overwhelmed single father has nothing to put in my school lunch sandwich but ketchup. The ketchup sandwich is a potential source of bullying at school and, more importantly, if some adult sees it they might find out about my family situation and alert the authorities and that would be a disaster. So, being a Resilient Child I take my lunch out to the park rather than brave the school cafeteria.
But where am I in this picture? How come I haven’t eaten my sandwich?
So. The worst thing about being a fictional character is the existence of editors. Writers are fine. We love writers. We worship writers. But editors? In this case the editor thought that the Neglected But Resilient Child was a redundant character. So out I went, doomed to hang around for another story that needs a NBRC. However, the editor forgot to excise the sandwich! So there it sits, an untethered detail, a sandwich that could have risen to the level of an endowed object or even the giddy heights of an objective correlative. But no, it’s just a sandwich. It’s not literature. It’s just litter.
♦
Sarah Ellis is the award-winning author of over twenty books for children and young adults, winner of the B.C. Lieutenant Governor’s Award For Literary Excellence and one of Canada’s nominees for the prestigious Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award. Having retired as a children’s librarian and then retired from college teaching she is now writing and reading fulltime in the rain in Vancouver. Her latest children’s book is As Glenn as Can Be, illustrated by Nancy Vo and published by Groundwood Books. Her memoir, My Year in Fairyland, was published in 2026 by Stonehewer Books. All her writing features a resilient child because, really, what else is there to write about?
♦♦♦
BIGGEST LITTER-ary PEEVE:
My current litter-ary pet peeve is the use of “calculus” to mean “calculation.” “Calculus” should only be used to denote an advanced branch of mathematics OR something you would discuss with your dental hygienist, not a plan or a scheme or a strategy.
_________________________________________________ Sarah Ellis














